|
|
See
details on this program at
Better Than Sox™
The Problem: SOX can be ineffective
In a survey by CFO Magazine, 70% of CFO's
said that the costs of Sarbanes Oxley outweighed its
benefits. Once you have a mound of control objectives,
narratives and flow charts, is there really any guarantee
that you won't still have exposure for financial statement
surprises and write-offs?
The Solution: Get back to the basics
To get to the root of the problem, I
introduced a program within my $1.5 billion group that
standardized the format of account reconciliations and
trained those personnel actually doing the reconciliations
on the proper way to document their work. This approach was
immediately adopted by the Corporate CFO as a company-wide
policy. The standardized format clearly and concisely
communicated the work that had been performed. It
helped those doing the reconciliations to better understand
what was expected of them. It made it clear that
errors and adjustments were being handled on a timely basis
and showed that sub-ledger activity was properly reconciled
to the general ledger. Supporting policies were
implemented to eliminate fluctuations in reserve accounts
and to immediately report any exceptions to the policy to
Corporate. This greatly simplified the work of the
external auditors, reduced fees and minimized exposure of
financial mistatements. |
|
|
Quote from outside auditor manager: |
“Without the standard reconciliations the audit would have been a 2 or 3
on a scale of 10 and taken 2 to 3 weeks. With the standard
reconciliations the audit was a 7 on a scale of 10 and was done in less
than a week.”"The auditors also said they wished
all their clients had a copy of our account analysis book." |
|